Category: California Supreme Court

California Supreme Court Rules Citizen’s Redistricting Commission State Senate Maps To Be Used in 2012


This is a definite blow to the California Republican Party which fears that Democrats using the Citizen’s Redistricting Commission’s Maps will be able to take over two-thirds of the number of California State Senate seats in November – paving the way for tax increases.

The California Supreme Court ruled today that state Senate maps drawn by a citizens commission will be used in this year’s elections, despite a pending referendum to overturn them.

The issue came before the High Court after a Republican-backed group, Fairness and Accountability in Redistricting, filed more than 711,000 signatures with county elections offices in a referendum to overturn Senate maps drawn by a 14-member citizens commission.

Californians will decide the fate of the newly drawn Senate districts in November if 504,760 of the signatures are from valid voters. Legislative candidates must file and run their campaigns before then, however, so justices needed to identify district maps to be in effect immediately.

County elections offices face a Feb. 24 deadline for certifying FAIR’s referendum signatures. Thus far, they have verified 57,761 of 80,127 signatures checked. If the percentage of valid signatures holds steady, 72 percent, the referendum would qualify for the ballot.

Twenty Senate seats are up for grabs this year – and the results carry high-stakes politically.

GOP officials contend that the new, commission drawn lines would give Democrats a strong chance of gaining two additional seats in the Senate, enough to gain the two-thirds supermajority needed to raise taxes or fees.

One has to wonder, however, whether the California GOP would have been better to invest their time and effort on electing more Republicans rather than challenging the Citizen’s Redistricting Commission.

The entire California supreme Court decision is here.


FAIR Files Lawsuit to Overturn the California Citizen’s Redistricting Commission’s State Senate Districts


FAIR (Fairness and Accountability In Redistricting) has already filed a referendum on the matter and are in the process of collecting signatures. But, now FAIR is going to court as well.

Aruging that California’s newly drawn Senate districts are unconstitutional, a Republican Party-backed group says it is filing a lawsuit today asking the California Supreme Court to kill the new maps.

“We believe there are serious constitutional flaws in the maps produced by the redistricting commission, and these are matters that the Supreme Court should look at immediately,” spokesman David Gilliard said.

Gilliard’s group, Fairness and Accountability In Redistricting (FAIR), also is collecting signatures in a referendum drive aimed at asking voters to reject the newly drawn Senate districts in a statewide election next June.

California’s 40 state Senate, 80 Assembly and 53 congressional districts were drawn for the first time this year by a 14-member independent panel, the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, rather than by the Legislature.

Gilliard’s group has raised nearly $500,000 thus far for its two-pronged effort to kill the Senate maps, including $188,000 from the California Republican Party and a cumulative $200,000 from current or past GOP state senators.

Many political analysts have said the new districts give Democrats a strong chance of gaining two additional seats in the Senate, enough to gain the two-thirds supermajority needed to raise taxes or fees.

The lawsuit alleges:

  • Eleven of the districts do not adequately consider compactness, contiguity, communities of interest, and existing county boundary lines.
  • Two major counties, Sacramento and San Bernardino, are unnecessarily split into six different districts.
  • The maps violate federal law by reducing the voting power of Latinos in Monterey, Santa Clara and the San Fernando portion of Los Angeles County.

The lawsuit also asks the California Supreme Court to ask special appointed court masters to draw interim state senate boundaries, if FAIR qualifies the referendum for the ballot.

Stay tuned…..


Flap’s California Morning Collection: September 1, 2011


Santa Barbara Mission

The California Legislature is in session today.

Lengthy senate sessions M-F this week. Noon-5pm today then 10am start times thru Friday- which btw is the last day to amend bills on floor

The California State Senate’s Schedule is here and the Assembly is here. The Assembly has a floor session scheduled for 9 AM today.

And, there are more POL’S fundraisers today:

Speaking of breakfast, legislators’ fundraisers are still in full swing, with breakfast events scheduled for Democrats Lois Wolk and Kevin deLeón and Republicans Jean Fuller and Joel Anderson. Evening events benefit Democrats Nancy Skinner, Charles Calderon and Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez.

On to today’s headlines:

Amazon makes offer to persuade California to drop sales tax collection law is offering to build a number of distribution centers and hire more than 1,000 workers if California lawmakers back away — at least temporarily — from their efforts to force the Internet giant to collect sales taxes on purchases made by customers from the Golden State.

The proposal was made in the form of draft legislation at a meeting Tuesday night between Amazon lobbyists and representatives of companies that belong to the California Retailers Assn.

Backers of California’s effort to collect about $300 million a year in unpaid taxes on Internet sales dismissed the Amazon compromise as a ploy. “It’s a totally cynical maneuver that’s part of their game that they try to play in every state that keeps them from getting the sales tax,” said Lenny Goldberg, a legislative advocate for the California Tax Reform Assn.

According to an informal memo based on a description of the deal by an Amazon lobbying firm, Greenberg Taurig, Amazon wants the state Legislature to repeal a law that took effect on July 1. The statute requires Amazon and other out-of-state Internet sellers to collect California sales taxes.

Amazon, so far, has said it would not do so and is bankrolling a referendum campaign to repeal the law.

Amazon wants California to refrain from forcing it to collect the sales tax until at least January of 2014.

In return, Amazon would hold the signatures it’s already collected and drop its effort to repeal the sales tax collection law on the June 2012 ballot. Amazon also would build build two fulfillment centers, one in Northern California and one in Southern California, with approximately one million square feet of floor space and 1,000 employees.

Amazon further offered to send its customers annual statements listing their total purchases and advising them that they owe California use tax on the goods, the memo said.

The use tax, which is paid by the buyer, is the same basic rate of 7.25% for the sales tax.

The retailers association confirmed that the meeting took place and dismissed the proposal as “not serious.”

Retailers President Bill Dombrowski said the deal “will only prolong the harm to small businesses that employ Californians.”

“We’re looking at their proposal,” said Retailers President Bill Dombrowski.

For its part, Ned Wigglesworth, a spokesman for the Amazon referendum campaign, declined to discuss the matter.

Amazon showdown over sales tax to fizzle?

In a move that could forestall a big ballot box showdown, has told traditional retailers it would agree to an online sales tax — but only if it’s delayed two years to give Congress time to pass a national law.

Under Amazon’s proposal, the company would go along with a sales tax for goods purchased online — as long as the tax is uniformly enforced across the country, according to sources involved in talks with the company. As part of the possible deal, Amazon is also offering to create 7,000 distribution center jobs in California and drop its push for an initiative to bar such a tax.

Amazon’s new position emerged from intense Capitol efforts to call a truce in a war that has seen California vote to impose the tax, Amazon respond by circulating petitions for a referendum to overturn the tax, and legislators taking steps to invalidate any such referendum.

“We’re trying to find a way to not have World War III,” said one brick-and-mortar retailer, whose group believes it’s unfair that Amazon doesn’t have to collect the tax. “There seems to be real interest in reaching an accord.”

A spokesman for Amazon declined to comment on the developments.

The political obstacles to a national agreement on online taxes are steep, and some Democratic leaders in California worried Wednesday that Amazon’s proposal for a two-year delay in California’s efforts to impose its own online sales tax is too much to pay for an uncertain outcome in Washington, D.C.

One leader of the group of traditional retailers said he was wary of Amazon’s offer.

“The so-called deal that Amazon has proposed is not serious,” Bill Dombrowski, president of the California Retailers Association, said in a statement. “Amazon is an out-of-state company with an unfair advantage over California businesses, and it is seeking a complete repeal of the law and another exemption from any further state action.

“Again and again, Amazon continues to demonstrate that they do not care about California businesses, taxpayers or communities,” Dombrowski said. “This deal will only prolong the harm to small businesses that employ Californians.”

It was not immediately clear how the Legislature would make up for the $200 million in revenues it is expecting to get from sales taxes Amazon was supposed to collect in the fiscal year that began July 1. Top Democrats such as state Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, have said that the state desperately needs that revenue.

But Republican leader Bob Dutton, R-Rancho Cucamonga, said Steinberg was working with him to put together a bill that could gain bipartisan support.

“They had a very informative meeting,” Dutton said. “I wanted to encourage the individual retailers and their associations to get together with Amazon to work this out. It would be a win-win for them and people of California.”

Earlier this week, Senate caucus leader Bob Huff, R-Diamond Bar, said he doubted Republicans would sign on to the effort to stop Amazon’s referendum.

“My guess is the caucus will take a position against (AB 155) in favor of letting the political process work,” Huff said. “As much as there might be merit in policy and we want to protect brick-and-mortar stores, there’s a bigger play in motion now. This bill is an end run around the political process.”

Huff indicated he would be in favor of allowing Congress to settle the issue.

“The retailers have made some good arguments, but this is one that would be better addressed nationally, or in the context of some kind of tax reform that makes a more level playing field for everybody,” Huff said.

Republicans may be hesitant to agree to any deal. Grover Norquist, the father of anti-tax pledges that Republicans break at risk of political retribution, sent a letter earlier this week to Republicans telling them that a vote to thwart their referendum was as good as a vote for taxes.

Bill to regulate California health insurance rates stalls

A controversial push to give state regulators the power to reject proposed increases in health insurance rates has stalled in the state Senate.

Assembly Bill 52, by Assemblyman Mike Feuer, D-Los Angeles, would let the state insurance commissioner or the director of the Department of Managed Health Care reject or modify proposed rate increases found to be “excessive,” “inadequate” or “discriminatory.”

The bill cleared the Assembly on a party-line vote in June. But Feuer has decided to hold off on any action this year, saying he does not have the votes to win approval from the Senate before the first year of the legislative session ends next week.

“Despite an outpouring of strong support from small business, working families and consumers throughout CA, the bill has hit a temporary roadblock in the Senate,” Feuer said in a statement. “Right now, not enough senators are prepared to vote for any form of health insurance rate regulation.”

A Feuer spokeswoman said the Los Angeles Democrat will continue to work for the bill’s passage next year, when the Legislature returns for the second leg of its two-year session.

Goodwin Liu confirmed to Calif. Supreme Court

Barely three months after Senate Republicans denounced Goodwin Liu as a left-wing extremist and torpedoed his nomination to a federal appeals court, he was lauded as a brilliant and open-minded legal scholar Wednesday and confirmed to a seat on the California Supreme Court.

The Commission on Judicial Appointments voted 3-0 to endorse Gov. Jerry Brown’s nomination of the 40-year-old Liu to succeed retired Justice Carlos Moreno as the only Democratic appointee on the seven-member court.

Liu will be sworn in to office by Brown today and join the court in time for Tuesday’s critical hearing on Proposition 8, the 2008 initiative that outlawed same-sex marriage in California. The justices will consider whether California law allows the measure’s sponsors to represent the interests of the state and its voters in appealing a federal judge’s decision that Prop. 8 is unconstitutional.

Enjoy your morning!